ArticleUrban ecosystems2025
Supporting pollinators in urban gardens: floral richness and abundance influence flower visitor interactions regardless of the surrounding landscape.
Article in Urban ecosystems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global Drivers of Plant-Pollinator Interaction Specialization in Gardens.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Native flowering plants and their pollinators for use in urban landscape: the Turkmen Mountain case.PeerJ · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Private gardens contribute to a large area of land within cities. Yet, little is known about the value of private gardens in pollinator conservation in terms of their management and position within the urban matrix. We investigated seasonal patterns in how environmental variables influenced plant-flower visitor interactions and the network structure in private gardens. We collected plant-flower visitor data in 18 private gardens, across Glasgow, Scotland, simultaneously recording floral abundance and richness, plant origin, garden size, land use diversity and the area of green space surrounding gardens. We observed a decline in native plant abundance from June until September, but flower visits to native and non-native plants did not track this seasonal pattern. Flower visits to native and non-native plants differed depending on whether visits were analysed at the community or plant species level. Furthermore, increasing non-native floral abundance showed a greater increase in flower visitors compared to when native floral abundance increased. Plant-flower visitor networks varied seasonally, becoming more specialised in June and September, but were not influenced by other environmental variables. Overall, higher floral richness and abundance within a garden influenced flower visits, independent of the surrounding landscape. Our results indicate that private gardens can support pollinators in cities, regardless of the urban context in which they are situated and that pollinator diversity may be improved in gardens by increasing floral diversity. We provide a list of attractive plants species to help inform floral plantings in gardens. Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11252-025-01848-7.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.