ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
A qualitative exploration of barriers and facilitators to fruit and vegetable consumption among Uruguayan adults using the social ecological model.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Fruit and vegetable consumption remains below public health recommendations worldwide. This study aimed to explore perceived barriers and facilitators to fruit and vegetable consumption among adults living in urban areas outside the capital city of Uruguay, and to identify strategies to promote intake. Methods: The study relied on a generic qualitative study using focus group discussions. Five focus groups were conducted between October 2024 and April 2025 in three cities in Uruguay (Atlántida, Paysandú, and Tacuarembó), involving 50 adults aged 18 to 77 years, diverse in sociodemographic backgrounds. Transcripts were analyzed using qualitative content analysis, combining inductive identification of emergent categories from the interview transcripts with deductive coding based on the levels of influence of the Social Ecological Model. Results: Although participants widely recognized the health benefits of fruit and vegetable consumption, most reported inadequate intake and described challenges in sustaining regular consumption. Barriers emerged across multiple levels of influence, including individual (e.g., taste preferences, lack of motivation, limited cooking skills), interpersonal (e.g., household composition and income), and the food environment (e.g., high prices, limited variety). Participants proposed a range of strategies to promote fruit and intake, primarily emphasizing nutrition education and social marketing, but also suggesting interventions to enhance convenience, reduce costs, and improve access. Conclusion: Findings underscore the need for multilevel interventions that move beyond individual-focused strategies to address broader environmental and structural determinants of dietary behavior. Adopting a food systems-oriented approach to fruit and vegetable promotion may enhance the relevance and effectiveness of public health initiatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.