ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Public sentiment dynamics in policy transitions: a sentiment analysis based on Weibo data.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: China had been implementing stringent dynamic policies during the COVID-19 pandemic. In late 2022, China made a sudden policy shift from its three-year dynamic zero-COVID to the re-opening policy, which resulted in a divergence of online public opinions and varying sentiments. However, few research has been done to explore the public's sentiment changes toward this abrupt policy shift. Methods: To better inform effective health communication regarding governments' change of policies for future initiatives, this study aims to analyze public's sentiment changes toward the launching of China's re-opening policy by using Weibo data. Our study examined 1, 423, 694 Weibo posts during the period from November 11, 2022 to January 11, 2023 to conduct a fine-grained emotion extraction. This study also used the LDA topic model to extract potential topics in Weibo posts to align topics and corresponding emotions for generating in-depth understanding. Results: Fluctuations of different emotions during these two months were profoundly analyzed and interpreted by taking cultural, social, and policy-related reasons into consideration. Notably, the average proportion of "disgust" (24.0%) exceeded that of "like" (22.8%) after mid-December, while "happiness" exhibited a gradual increase to 12.0%. Discussion: Results of this study will be essential to informing the government's effective health communication in the time of public health crisis, facilitating pandemic control and prevention, and enlightening on the maintenance of public's well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.