Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41246095›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Public sentiment dynamics in policy transitions: a sentiment analysis based on Weibo data.

Xuan Ning, Ruonan Li, Dewei Lan, Chaofan Chen, Yupeng Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xuan NingDepartment of Social Sciences, Beijing Normal-Hong Kong Baptist University, Zhuhai, China.
Ruonan LiDepartment of Social Sciences, Beijing Normal-Hong Kong Baptist University, Zhuhai, China.
Dewei LanFaculty of Science and Technology, Beijing Normal-Hong Kong Baptist University, Zhuhai, China.
Chaofan ChenSchool of Governance and Policy Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Yupeng LiDepartment of Interactive Media, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: China had been implementing stringent dynamic policies during the COVID-19 pandemic. In late 2022, China made a sudden policy shift from its three-year dynamic zero-COVID to the re-opening policy, which resulted in a divergence of online public opinions and varying sentiments. However, few research has been done to explore the public's sentiment changes toward this abrupt policy shift. Methods: To better inform effective health communication regarding governments' change of policies for future initiatives, this study aims to analyze public's sentiment changes toward the launching of China's re-opening policy by using Weibo data. Our study examined 1, 423, 694 Weibo posts during the period from November 11, 2022 to January 11, 2023 to conduct a fine-grained emotion extraction. This study also used the LDA topic model to extract potential topics in Weibo posts to align topics and corresponding emotions for generating in-depth understanding. Results: Fluctuations of different emotions during these two months were profoundly analyzed and interpreted by taking cultural, social, and policy-related reasons into consideration. Notably, the average proportion of "disgust" (24.0%) exceeded that of "like" (22.8%) after mid-December, while "happiness" exhibited a gradual increase to 12.0%. Discussion: Results of this study will be essential to informing the government's effective health communication in the time of public health crisis, facilitating pandemic control and prevention, and enlightening on the maintenance of public's well-being.

Indexed as

COVID-19EmotionsHealth PolicyPublic OpinionSocial MediaChinaHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19health communicationLDA topic modelpublic health policiessentiment analysisWeibo

Identifiers

PMID41246095
PMCPMC12615401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.