Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41246091›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Corona phobia and mental health among nurses: identifying determinants in a cross-sectional survey.

Menevse Yildirim, Emre Yildiz, Seyda Seren Intepeler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Menevse YildirimDepartment of Nursing, Fethiye Faculty of Health Sciences, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Muğla, Türkiye.
Emre YildizDokuz Eylul University, Faculty of Nursing, Izmir, Türkiye.
Seyda Seren IntepelerDokuz Eylul Universitesi Hemsirelik Fakultesi, Izmir, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Assessing the psychological impact of the pandemic on nurses is essential for protecting their well-being and ensuring the resilience of healthcare systems. Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional study following the STROBE reporting guidelines. The study included 417 nurses from Dokuz Eylul University Research and Practice Hospital who participated voluntarily. Data were collected between July and October 2021 using the Sociodemographic Data Form, the COVID-19 Phobia Scale (C19P-S), and the Mental Health Continuum Short Form (MHC-SF). Descriptive statistics and multiple linear regression analysis were used ( Results: The mean C19P-S score was 49.03 ± 17.29. Gender, education, perceived general health status, and intention to quit predicted 17% of COVID-19 phobia variance ( Conclusion: Nurses experienced moderate COVID-19 phobia, with female gender, undergraduate education, worse perceived health, and intention to quit emerging as significant predictors, collectively explaining 17% of the variance. Interventions are needed to strengthen nurses' mental health, particularly emotional well-being. Healthcare policymakers and administrators should implement strategies to support nurses' psychological well-being and foster a fear-free work environment through empowerment.

Indexed as

COVID-19Mental HealthNursesPhobic DisordersAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesTurkeycorona phobiaCOVID-19mental healthnursespandemicwell-being

Identifiers

PMID41246091
PMCPMC12611932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.