ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Early risk detection of metabolic syndrome using sex-specific machine learning models in military personnel.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metabolic syndrome is a critical predictor of future cardiometabolic disease and an emerging public health concern, particularly in high-demand populations such as military personnel. This study aimed to develop and evaluate sex-specific machine learning models for the early detection of metabolic syndrome using annual health check data. We analyzed records from 179,620 Taiwanese Air Force personnel between 2014 and 2022, incorporating demographic, anthropometric, clinical, lifestyle, mental health, and biochemical variables. Six machine learning algorithms-including logistic regression, random forest, K-nearest neighbor, support vector machine, neural network, and naïve Bayes-were trained separately for men and women. Among these models, logistic regression outperformed the others, achieving an accuracy and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.89. Body mass index, age, and alanine aminotransferase levels were consistent predictors across sexes. For men, total cholesterol and uric acid contributed significantly, while hemoglobin and hematocrit were more predictive in women. These findings demonstrate that sex-specific predictive models can support early identification of individuals at high risk for metabolic syndrome, enabling targeted prevention strategies and strengthening population health efforts in military populations and other young to middle-aged adult groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.