Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41246075›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Early risk detection of metabolic syndrome using sex-specific machine learning models in military personnel.

Wei-Yun Wang, Yi-Syuan Wu, Yen Huang, Wen-Chii Tzeng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wei-Yun Wang *Department of Nursing, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yi-Syuan Wu *Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Taitung University, Taitung, Taiwan.
Yen HuangDepartment of Nursing, Tri-Service General Hospital Songshan Branch, Taipei, Taiwan.
Wen-Chii TzengCollege of Nursing, National Defense Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metabolic syndrome is a critical predictor of future cardiometabolic disease and an emerging public health concern, particularly in high-demand populations such as military personnel. This study aimed to develop and evaluate sex-specific machine learning models for the early detection of metabolic syndrome using annual health check data. We analyzed records from 179,620 Taiwanese Air Force personnel between 2014 and 2022, incorporating demographic, anthropometric, clinical, lifestyle, mental health, and biochemical variables. Six machine learning algorithms-including logistic regression, random forest, K-nearest neighbor, support vector machine, neural network, and naïve Bayes-were trained separately for men and women. Among these models, logistic regression outperformed the others, achieving an accuracy and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.89. Body mass index, age, and alanine aminotransferase levels were consistent predictors across sexes. For men, total cholesterol and uric acid contributed significantly, while hemoglobin and hematocrit were more predictive in women. These findings demonstrate that sex-specific predictive models can support early identification of individuals at high risk for metabolic syndrome, enabling targeted prevention strategies and strengthening population health efforts in military populations and other young to middle-aged adult groups.

Indexed as

Early DiagnosisMachine LearningMetabolic SyndromeMilitary PersonnelAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSex FactorsTaiwanmachine learningmetabolic syndromemilitary personnelprecision preventionpredictive modelsex differences

Identifiers

PMID41246075
PMCPMC12617432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.