ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Developing the Agile Institute, an effort to incorporate agile methodologies into Hackensack Meridian Health.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The persistent challenge of implementing meaningful and sustainable change in healthcare is well-documented. Barriers include resource limitations, technical insufficiencies, and resistance from entrenched processes and systems within hospitals, clinics, and health systems. Traditional quality improvement (QI) frameworks, while valuable, often fall short in addressing the variability and unpredictability of human behavior and decision-making that reflects the uniqueness of individual experiences and backgrounds working together in a complex organization. In response, Hackensack Meridian Health (HMH), a large integrated health system, established the Agile Institute to promote and diffuse methodologies from Agile Science (sprints, feedback loops, techniques from behavioral psychology to encourage certain behaviors, etc.) as a means to accelerate and sustain quality improvement efforts in care and patient outcomes. This narrative case study describes the conception, structure, and impact of the Agile Institute at HMH. The Institute was designed around three core pillars: training and education, consultation, and organizational identity development. Bootcamps and certification programs equipped staff across the health system with the knowledge and mindset needed to apply Agile. Consultative groups facilitated co-design sessions and iterative sprints, fostering collaboration and interdisciplinary development and implementation of innovative solutions. Intentional brand development helped to build engagement and credibility in both internal and external audiences. Over its first year, the Agile Institute achieved significant milestones: training over 130 staff, launching collaborative physician networks, and supporting system-wide initiatives that improved standardization and patient outcomes. The Institute's approach-grounded in psychological safety, stakeholder co-design, and iterative feedback-demonstrated the value of embedding Agile principles not only in QI projects but also in organizational culture. Lessons learned highlight the importance of a minimally viable, adaptable structure and the necessity of aligning Agile strategies with both system and individual priorities. The HMH Agile Institute offers a replicable model for other healthcare organizations seeking to drive sustainable, system-wide transformation through Agile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.