ArticleMethodsX2025
FRAMe: Empirically informed agent-based modeling of flood resilience in the Mekong River Basin.
Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The FRAMe (Flood Resilience Agent-Based Model) serves as a framework designed to simulate flood resilience dynamics at the community level, focusing on a rural settlement in the Mekong River basin. Integrating empirical data from extensive surveys, Bayesian networks, and hydrological simulations, the framework quantifies resilience as a trade-off between robustness (resistance to damage) and adaptability (capacity for dynamic response). Agents include households, governments, and other institutional actors, linked by social and governance networks that facilitate knowledge transfer, resource distribution, and risk communication. FRAMe incorporates mechanisms for policy interventions and individual and collective decision-making, grounded in Protection Motivation Theory and MoHuB frameworks. The framework utilizes geographic data to achieve a spatially explicit design. Sensitivity analyses across five key parameter groups covering network structure, knowledge dissemination, and policy intensity demonstrate the model's robustness and allow systematic evaluation of intervention effects. Simulation results show that increasing the intensity of government assistance reduces average recovery time by around 50 % and improves system-level robustness by about 30 %. In contrast, enhancing emergency relief primarily improves adaptability (approximately 10 %) and shortens recovery time, with limited effect on robustness. Higher knowledge dissemination roughly doubles adaptability but also introduces greater variability in robustness. By examining policy scenarios and agent behavior, FRAMe aims to inform adaptive flood management strategies and foster the improvement of community resilience.•The agent-based model is described using the ODD+
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.