Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41246038›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2025

A mixed-methods strategy to analyse the dynamics of safety violations of the construction workers in Hong Kong.

Wing Chi Tsang, Shoeb Ahmed Memon, Steve Rowlinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wing Chi TsangSchool of Science and Technology, Hong Kong Metropolitan University, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Shoeb Ahmed MemonFaculty of Society and Design, Bond University, 14 University Drive, Robina, Gold Coast, QLD 4226, Australia.
Steve RowlinsonFaculty of Society and Design, Bond University, 14 University Drive, Robina, Gold Coast, QLD 4226, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a lack of research specifically addressing safety violations among construction workers in Hong Kong. This study, therefore, aims to address the research gap and provide insight into the causes of safety violations. This study employs a mixed-methods approach to achieve research objectives and leverage the benefits of each method. Using a Theory of Planned Behaviour framework and High Reliability Organising (HRO), this research adopted a questionnaire survey to test the relationships among the constructs, which obtained 365 valid responses. Subsequently, 37 semi-structured interviews were conducted to gain insight into workers' perspectives. The research results confirmed reliability and validity of the employed methods. Intention significantly affects the occurrence of safety violations. Among cognitive determinants of safety violations, two factors have a notable influence on intention, with Perceived Behavioural Control (PBC) being the most critical factor. HRO, as the distal factor that impacts cognitive determinants of safety violations, initiates a transformative approach to construction safety management that emphasises continuous reflection and improvement. Practical strategies are recommended to target PBC and attitude to improve workers' intentions. It is also recommended that training be designed to cater to contextual features of different work groups, such as young and elderly workers.

Indexed as

Construction safetyHigh reliability organisingSafety violationsTheory of planned behaviour

Identifiers

PMID41246038
PMCPMC12616085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.