ArticleMethodsX2025
A mixed-methods strategy to analyse the dynamics of safety violations of the construction workers in Hong Kong.
Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a lack of research specifically addressing safety violations among construction workers in Hong Kong. This study, therefore, aims to address the research gap and provide insight into the causes of safety violations. This study employs a mixed-methods approach to achieve research objectives and leverage the benefits of each method. Using a Theory of Planned Behaviour framework and High Reliability Organising (HRO), this research adopted a questionnaire survey to test the relationships among the constructs, which obtained 365 valid responses. Subsequently, 37 semi-structured interviews were conducted to gain insight into workers' perspectives. The research results confirmed reliability and validity of the employed methods. Intention significantly affects the occurrence of safety violations. Among cognitive determinants of safety violations, two factors have a notable influence on intention, with Perceived Behavioural Control (PBC) being the most critical factor. HRO, as the distal factor that impacts cognitive determinants of safety violations, initiates a transformative approach to construction safety management that emphasises continuous reflection and improvement. Practical strategies are recommended to target PBC and attitude to improve workers' intentions. It is also recommended that training be designed to cater to contextual features of different work groups, such as young and elderly workers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.