Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41246037›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2025

A comparative deep learning methodology for plant insect image classification: Assessment of CNN architectures and augmentation techniques.

Md Tomal Ahmed Sajib, Nazmul Huda Badhon, Imrus Salehin, Md Sakibul Hassan Rifat, Faysal Ahmmed, Pritom Saha, Nazmun Nessa Moon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Md Tomal Ahmed SajibDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Daffodil International University, Dhaka 1216, Bangladesh.
Nazmul Huda BadhonDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Daffodil International University, Dhaka 1216, Bangladesh.
Imrus SalehinDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Daffodil International University, Dhaka 1216, Bangladesh.
Md Sakibul Hassan RifatDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Bangladesh University of Business and Technology, Rupnagar R/A, Mirpur-2, Dhaka 1216, Bangladesh.
Faysal AhmmedDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Bangladesh University of Business and Technology, Rupnagar R/A, Mirpur-2, Dhaka 1216, Bangladesh.
Pritom SahaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Daffodil International University, Dhaka 1216, Bangladesh.
Nazmun Nessa MoonDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Daffodil International University, Dhaka 1216, Bangladesh.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning has become a leading approach for agricultural image analysis and leveraging it for pest recognition has offered tangible value for crop protection. This work has presented a comparative methodology for plant-insect image classification on the BAU-Insectv2 dataset, emphasizing how augmentation choices and optimizers have shaped model behavior on small, field-collected data. We have evaluated four convolutional architectures (ResNet101V2, EfficientNet-B1, InceptionV3, InceptionResNetV1) under transfer learning, six single-factor augmentations, and three optimizers (Adam, SGD, RMSprop). Performance has been assessed with accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. Across settings, Adam has generally produced the most stable high accuracy on limited data; model-augmentation pairings have also mattered-e.g., EfficientNet-B1 with cropping has achieved near-perfect accuracy, while ResNet101V2 with rotation and InceptionV3 with brightness have remained competitive. The study has delivered a reproducible pipeline and augmentation-aware guidance that practitioners can adopt when data are scarce, enabling robust insect recognition for downstream agronomic decision support. • We have curated BAU-Insectv2 and designed six single-factor augmentations. • We have benchmarked four transfer-learned CNNs with three optimizers. • We have validated with standard metrics and optimizer-augmentation ablations.

Indexed as

Agricultural image analysisConvolutional neural networksDeep learningImage augmentationInsect pest classificationSmall custom dataset

Identifiers

PMID41246037
PMCPMC12617762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.