Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41245987›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of preventive cardiology2025

Comparison of PREVENT with the pooled cohort equation for estimating atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk among patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Ilana M Usiskin, Brittany N Weber, Ying Qi, Katherine Zhong, Mary Jeffway, Michael E Weinblatt, Nancy Shadick, Jorge Plutzky, Katherine P Liao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of preventive cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ilana M UsiskinDivision of Rheumatology, Inflammation, and Immunity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Brittany N WeberDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Ying QiDivision of Rheumatology, Inflammation, and Immunity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Katherine ZhongDivision of Rheumatology, Inflammation, and Immunity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Mary JeffwayDivision of Rheumatology, Inflammation, and Immunity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Michael E WeinblattDivision of Rheumatology, Inflammation, and Immunity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Nancy ShadickDivision of Rheumatology, Inflammation, and Immunity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Jorge PlutzkyDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Katherine P LiaoDivision of Rheumatology, Inflammation, and Immunity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To determine the performance of the PREVENT equation for estimating atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) compared to the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association ASCVD risk estimator, i.e., the pooled cohort equation (PCE). Methods: We studied patients from an RA longitudinal registry with annual blood samples. After identifying the earliest sample for each patient (index date), we excluded patients with prevalent cardiovascular disease (CVD) or on statin/lipid lowering therapy through the index date. Medical records were reviewed for ASCVD events including coronary heart disease and stroke up to 10 years after index date. PREVENT-ASCVD and PCE were calculated, and patients were categorized into low, borderline, intermediate, and high ASCVD risk categories. Discrimination and calibration of PREVENT and PCE for ASCVD events were determined. Results: We studied 267 RA patients mean age 57 years, 83 % female; 27 patients (10.1 %) had an ASCVD event. The AUC for PREVENT was 0.71 and 0.70 for PCE. Compared to observed ASCVD events, PREVENT underestimated ASCVD risk, to a larger degree compared to PCE; PREVENT either classified patients in the same risk category or reclassified to lower risk categories compared to PCE; 28 % of patients would have a definitive recommendation for statin initiation with PCE vs 14 % with PREVENT. Conclusion: Among a cohort of RA patients, PREVENT and PCE underestimated 10-year ASCVD risk compared to observed ASCVD events, with overall lower risk estimates in PREVENT compared to PCE. Adoption of PREVENT may lead to less aggressive primary CV prevention in RA.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular diseasePrimary preventionRheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID41245987
PMCPMC12615325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.