ArticleAmerican journal of preventive cardiology2025
Comparison of PREVENT with the pooled cohort equation for estimating atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk among patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Article in American journal of preventive cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AJPC 2025 in review: A year of growth & clearer mandate for actionable prevention.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To determine the performance of the PREVENT equation for estimating atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) compared to the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association ASCVD risk estimator, i.e., the pooled cohort equation (PCE). Methods: We studied patients from an RA longitudinal registry with annual blood samples. After identifying the earliest sample for each patient (index date), we excluded patients with prevalent cardiovascular disease (CVD) or on statin/lipid lowering therapy through the index date. Medical records were reviewed for ASCVD events including coronary heart disease and stroke up to 10 years after index date. PREVENT-ASCVD and PCE were calculated, and patients were categorized into low, borderline, intermediate, and high ASCVD risk categories. Discrimination and calibration of PREVENT and PCE for ASCVD events were determined. Results: We studied 267 RA patients mean age 57 years, 83 % female; 27 patients (10.1 %) had an ASCVD event. The AUC for PREVENT was 0.71 and 0.70 for PCE. Compared to observed ASCVD events, PREVENT underestimated ASCVD risk, to a larger degree compared to PCE; PREVENT either classified patients in the same risk category or reclassified to lower risk categories compared to PCE; 28 % of patients would have a definitive recommendation for statin initiation with PCE vs 14 % with PREVENT. Conclusion: Among a cohort of RA patients, PREVENT and PCE underestimated 10-year ASCVD risk compared to observed ASCVD events, with overall lower risk estimates in PREVENT compared to PCE. Adoption of PREVENT may lead to less aggressive primary CV prevention in RA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.