ArticleJournal of human kinetics2025
L-arginine Supplementation Does Not Enhance Anaerobic Performance in Trained Female Handball Players.
Article in Journal of human kinetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of Acute Citrulline Malate Supplementation on Repeated 100 m Sprint Performance in Trained Sprinters: A Randomized Crossover Study.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the effect of eight weeks of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) plus L-arginine supplementation on performance of highly trained female handball players. Thirty-two female handball athletes (age: 20.69 ± 0.45 years, body height: 169.38 ± 0.57 cm, body mass: 66.49 ± 1.06 kg) were randomly assigned to a placebo (n = 8), a L-Arg (n = 8), a HIIT+placebo (n = 8) or a HIIT+L-Arg (n = 8) group. HIIT was performed 2 days/week for 8 weeks and consisted of running at 90 to 95% of maximum aerobic speed with 15 s of active recovery, with all training sessions performed on a handball court. The L-arginine supplementation was 0.1 g/kg on training days and 0.05 g/kg on rest days. Performance was assessed using a comprehensive battery of tests, including the 20-m sprint test, the T-agility test, the Cooper test, and the running-based anaerobic sprint test (RAST). Both high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and L-arginine (L-Arg) supplementation led to significant improvements in anaerobic power and 20-m sprint speed (p < 0.05). However, combining HIIT with L-Arg resulted in improvements solely in anaerobic power, without yielding any additional benefits compared to HIIT alone. Notably, all intervention groups (L-Arg, HIIT, and HIIT + L-Arg) experienced significant declines in agility performance (p < 0.05). None of the strategies improved performance during Cooper test. These findings suggest that L-Arg supplementation during HIIT does not confer additional performance benefits and may even exert detrimental effects. Therefore, HIIT alone appears to be sufficient for enhancing anaerobic capacity in highly trained female handball players, and the use of L-Arg supplementation may be unnecessary or counterproductive in this context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.