ReviewNational science review2025
Uncovering battery electrochemical mechanisms by artificial intelligence.
Review in National science review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Conduction-Nucleation-Competition-Guided 3D Adaptive Gradient Buffer for Dendrite-Free All-Solid-State Lithium Metal Batteries.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- A Quantitative Electrostatic Potential Descriptor Enables Deep Learning-Accelerated Discovery of High-Performance Lithium-Ion Battery Electrolytes.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026Article
- Reinforcement Learning for Cathode Material Design Through Sequential Decision-Making Frameworks.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Advancing battery failure diagnosis by knowledge-augmented large language models.National science review · 2026Article
- Self-Regulating Sodium-Ion Battery Materials: From Phase Reconstruction to Functional Activation.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Batteries have been driving the sustainable energy transition by empowering critical applications such as consumer electronics, electric vehicles and grid energy storage systems. Key challenges in battery research and development require a fundamental understanding of the dynamic evolution of electrochemical interfaces, cross-dimensional and cross-scale relationships, and intertwined interaction electrochemical processes. Advanced characterization and theoretical computation-based methods generate considerably discrete, heterogeneous and condition-sensitive but huge data streams. Such complexity leads to difficulties in human expert-oriented interpretations. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers new promise for handling this gigantic amount of data by enabling efficient curation, preprocessing, model construction, deployment, optimization and, most importantly, interpretation. While AI integration into battery research has been well documented, this Review pays special attention to its potential to uncover three critical yet outstanding chemical mechanistic aspects. First, AI reveals temporal evolution mechanisms by denoising and statistically analyzing large, uneven-quality time-resolved data. Second, it discovers latent relationships across data with multiple dimensions and scales, which are difficult to infer from established theories alone. Third, it decouples complex interaction networks by identifying dominating factors and their relative contributions. We highlight the importance of standardized data collection, open-source data deposition, domain expert knowledge integration, application of advanced AI models, and experiment optimization to scalable and electrochemistry-informed AI applications. While emerging tools like large language models and autonomous agents hold promise, their impact will rely on thoughtful human-AI collaboration that preserves safety, ethics and mechanistic insight.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.