ArticleHealth science reports2025
The Silent Risk of Sudan Virus: A Review Addressing Global Health Vulnerabilities.
Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ebola virus disease: A persistent challenge in global health security.Open veterinary journal · 2026Review
- The Silent Risk of Sudan Virus: A Review Addressing Global Health Vulnerabilities.Health science reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aim: Sudan Virus Disease (SVD) is a deadly hemorrhagic fever caused by the Sudan virus, first discovered in Sudan in 1976. This disease has been linked to several outbreaks in sub-Saharan Africa, particularly in Uganda. The high fatality rate of SVD, ranging from 41% to 70%, emphasizes the critical need for effective preventive measures and treatments. This perspective piece focuses on the challenges faced by low-income countries in handling SVD, focusing on Uganda's 2025 epidemic and the ongoing global efforts to develop vaccines and therapies. Discussion: SVD spreads primarily through contact with the bodily fluids of infected individuals or animals. The disease's prolonged incubation period complicates early detection and containment. In resource-limited settings like Uganda, the healthcare system often struggles with inadequate infrastructure and personnel, hindering effective outbreak control. Cultural practices, such as burial rituals involving physical contact with the deceased, further exacerbate transmission. Despite advancements in monoclonal antibody treatments and vaccine development, these solutions are not yet widely available. The slow pace of clinical trials and logistical challenges prevent rapid deployment of these interventions. International collaboration is crucial to address these obstacles. By improving healthcare infrastructure, enhancing early detection systems, and ensuring equitable access to treatments, the global community can better respond to SVD outbreaks. Additionally, public education and cultural adaptation are vital in reducing transmission risks. Conclusion: A comprehensive global strategy is needed to tackle SVD, with an emphasis on strengthening healthcare systems, accelerating vaccine development, and improving access to treatments in vulnerable regions. A coordinated response, with international support, can help mitigate future outbreaks and protect at-risk populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.