Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41245944›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Recurrent Airway Swelling in a Patient With Lymphoproliferative Disorder: A Diagnostic Challenge Between Anaphylaxis and Acquired Angioedema.

Mahmudul Hasan Nahid, Bilal Khan, Reema Munshi

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mahmudul Hasan NahidAcute Internal Medicine, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, GBR.
Bilal KhanEmergency Department, Lancaster Royal Infirmary, Lancaster, GBR.
Reema MunshiInternal Medicine, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Distinguishing between anaphylaxis and bradykinin-mediated angioedema can be difficult in the acute setting, particularly when airway compromise dominates the presentation. Recognition is crucial, as management strategies differ substantially. An 84-year-old woman presented to the Emergency Department in Preston with rapidly progressive swelling of the lips, tongue, and neck, accompanied by dysphagia and a hoarse voice. She had self-administered multiple doses of an adrenaline autoinjector before arrival. On examination, she was hemodynamically stable and afebrile, with marked tongue and floor-of-mouth edema but no urticaria or pruritus. Considering refractory anaphylaxis, she received intravenous dexamethasone, an adrenaline nebulizer, and an adrenaline infusion. ENT and ICU teams were involved; flexible nasendoscopy confirmed edema of the floor of the mouth and arytenoids, with mild epiglottic involvement but an adequate glottic opening. This episode followed several similar admissions since 2022, each previously treated as anaphylaxis with limited response to adrenaline. Further investigation revealed normal mast-cell tryptase (6.1 µg/L) and persistently low C4 (<0.03 g/L) with normal C3 (1.29 g/L), findings consistent with C1-esterase inhibitor (C1-INH) deficiency. Given her history of CD5-negative low-grade B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder, a diagnosis of acquired angioedema was made following multidisciplinary review, and treatment with icatibant was initiated. This case highlights the importance of considering bradykinin-mediated angioedema in patients with recurrent "refractory anaphylaxis." The absence of urticaria, normal tryptase, and low complement levels should prompt evaluation for C1-INH deficiency, allowing timely, targeted management and improved outcomes.

Indexed as

acquired angioedemabradykinin mediated angioedemac1 esterase inhibitor deficiencyicatibant therapylymphoproliferative disorderrefractory anaphylaxis

Identifiers

PMID41245944
PMCPMC12619632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.