ArticleCureus2025
Assessing and Enhancing Adherence to the Standard Aseptic Non-touch Technique in Peripheral Intravenous Cannulation: A Quality Improvement Project in a Resource-Constrained Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Neonatal sepsis remains a critical concern in neonatal care, contributing significantly to morbidity and mortality. Aseptic techniques prevent infections during invasive procedures such as peripheral intravenous (IV) cannulation, particularly the aseptic non-touch technique (ANTT). The purpose of this study was to assess the baseline level of ANTT adherence among medical personnel and to analyze the effect of a structured educational intervention on compliance rates. The implementation of ANTT is based on the premise that having a standard framework and ensuring its compliance will decrease infection rates and consequently improve health care, especially in the resource-constrained setups of low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) Objectives The primary goal of this quality improvement project (QIP) is to assess baseline adherence to the ANTT during peripheral IV cannulation and evaluate improvement following a structured educational intervention using two Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) at the Combined Military Hospital, Multan, Pakistan. Methods This QIP comprised two PDSA cycles to improve compliance with ANTT guidelines. Baseline data on adherence to aseptic practices were collected using a QI Surveillance Proforma to measure compliance. A structured educational intervention, which included presentations, video demonstrations, hands-on training, and competency assessments, was implemented over four months to improve compliance. The target audience included the NICU staff and nursing cadets. Compliance rates were measured post-intervention in both cycles using the same standardized checklist evaluating key aseptic practices. Results The compliance rates for peripheral IV cannulation were initially 66%. However, the analysis post-intervention showed a significant increase in compliance, with 89% median compliance after the first PDSA cycle and 94% after the second cycle. We saw that hand hygiene improved its adherence rates from 50% to 84%, while tray cleaning practices also improved from 64% to 87%. The overall adherence rate for peripheral IV cannulation showed an increase in rates to 92%. That is a huge improvement and shows targeted educational strategies can have a substantial impact. Conclusion This QIP highlights that carefully planned educational interventions, training, and hands-on practice can have on NICU healthcare providers' adherence to aseptic procedures. We found that frequent skills assessments with uncomplicated, easy-to-remember procedures can ensure that our system operates near maximum efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.