ReviewCureus2025
The Changing Landscape of Ankle Fractures in the Era of Electric Micromobility: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electric bicycles (e-bikes) and electric scooters (e-scooters) have been rapidly adopted in urban environments in the United Kingdom and various Western countries. This has introduced a new mechanism of injury in these environments. Whilst the initial research studies focused on head injuries, upper limb injuries and overall epidemiology, the specific patterns regarding lower limb orthopaedic injuries, especially ankle fractures, are not well defined. This systematic review aims to characterise ankle fracture patterns due to e-bike and e-scooter use and assess whether the incidence and severity have worsened since adopting these devices. We performed a systematic literature review in PubMed for articles published between 2015 and 2025. This timeframe was selected as micromobility adoption was uncommon prior to 2015. Our initial search yielded 83 studies; after screening and eligibility assessment, 11 studies were included for final analysis. From the studies, we were able to identify that there was a distinct injury pattern associated with e-scooters, i.e., isolated ankle rotational fractures from low-energy falls. Data from UK Government sources initially indicated that e-scooter users primarily experienced low-energy injuries, while e-bike users, although reported less frequently, seemed to suffer more high-energy fracture patterns due to higher speeds. However, recent data suggest that the frequency and severity of injuries from e-scooter accidents are increasing, with more cases exhibiting high-energy mechanisms. UK-specific data, though limited, align with global trends, indicating a significant and growing burden on Emergency Departments and Orthopaedic services, with a notable proportion of injuries requiring operative intervention. In comparative studies, e-bike crashes were less frequently linked to ankle fractures. All data indicate a sharp rise in overall micromobility injuries over recent years. Ankle fractures from electric micro-mobility devices represent a significant and evolving public health issue. While consistent with international findings, the current evidence from the UK is insufficient. There is a pressing need for prospective, multicentre studies and national registry data to define these injury patterns better and inform targeted public safety measures and orthopaedic preparedness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.