ArticleMedComm2025
Applying Genetic Risk Score to Improve Risk Assessment of New-Onset Lupus Nephritis in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Large-Scale Prospective Cohort Study.
Article in MedComm, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic and epigenetic determinants of relapse risk in lupus nephritis.Lupus science & medicine · 2026Article
- Genomic Landscape of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Lupus Nephritis Globally and the Gaps in Africa.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lupus nephritis (LN) is one of the most severe manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, reliable tools for predicting LN risk remain limited. In this multicenter prospective cohort study, we developed, validated, and refined a risk stratification model for new-onset LN. A total of 2441 SLE patients without baseline renal involvement were consecutively enrolled from the Chinese SLE Treatment and Research (CSTAR) registry, with 215 (8.8%) developed LN in a median follow-up time of 3.5 years. A combination of clinical predictors, age < 30 years, absence of arthritis, serositis, hypocomplementemia, and positive anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies identified a clinical high-risk group (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.