Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41245871›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology2025

Motor system modulation by transcranial alternating current stimulation: insights from functional MRI-a scoping review.

Simon Han, Jason Luo, Ivy Tuong Van Vo, Won Kee Chang, Nam-Jong Paik, Ji Soo Choi, Won-Seok Kim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Simon HanDepartment of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Jason LuoDepartment of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Ivy Tuong Van VoDepartment of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Won Kee ChangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Nam-Jong PaikDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Ji Soo ChoiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Won-Seok KimDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique that delivers oscillatory currents to modulate endogenous brain rhythms. Frequency-specific effects on motor function have been reported, yet the neural mechanisms remain incompletely understood. This scoping review synthesizes functional MRI (fMRI) evidence on tACS-induced modulation of motor-related brain activity and connectivity in healthy individuals and patients with neurological conditions. A systematic search of the literature identified six eligible studies with a total of 108 participants, of whom 26 were individuals with chronic stroke. Stimulation frequencies ranged from 5 to 70 Hz, most often targeting the primary motor cortex. Gamma-band tACS (≥50 Hz) was generally associated with increased task-related activation and strengthened connectivity within sensorimotor networks in healthy participants, whereas alpha- and beta-band stimulation produced variable or region-specific effects. In the chronic stroke group, 10 Hz tACS enhanced localized activation, while 20 Hz tACS promoted broader network integration. These findings suggest that tACS may modulate motor networks in a frequency- and site-dependent manner, with preliminary implications for post-stroke rehabilitation. However, substantial heterogeneity in study design, stimulation parameters, and analysis approaches limits direct comparison across studies. Standardized protocols, larger clinical trials, and multimodal approaches integrating fMRI with electroencephalography are warranted to clarify underlying mechanisms and optimize tACS applications for motor recovery.

Indexed as

functional magnetic resonance imagingmotor systemnetworkneuromodulationstroketranscranial alternating current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID41245871
PMCPMC12615180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.