Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41245867›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology2025

Neurobiological and neuropsychological disturbance in EDS.

Matt Westerman, Alex Kafkas, Adrian Parry-Jones, Samantha Strong, Chris Retzler, Glyn Hallam

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Matt WestermanFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Alex KafkasFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Adrian Parry-JonesGeoffrey Jefferson Brain Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Northern Care Alliance, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Samantha StrongCollege of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Chris RetzlerDepartment of Social and Psychological Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, United Kingdom.
Glyn HallamSchool of Education, Language and Psychology, York St John University, York, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (EDS) is a collection of connective tissue disorders, defined by genetic defects in collagen and extracellular matrix proteins that lead to joint hypermobility, skin fragility, and vascular complications. However, recent studies point to a broader impact, revealing how EDS has both neurological and psychological effects. This review explores these neurological and neuropsychological dimensions of EDS across its 13 subtypes, drawing together evidence on brain structure changes such as Chiari malformations and craniocervical instability, alongside small fibre neuropathy, blood-brain barrier vulnerabilities, and cerebrovascular risks, particularly prevalent in the vascular EDS subtype. The review will also explore how these physical disruptions may act upon mental health, fueling anxiety, mood instability, and cognitive challenges. Mechanisms such as neuroinflammation, altered interoception, and chronic pain may contribute to these effects and drive emotional dysregulation. By reviewing clinical observations, neuroimaging findings, and emerging theories, this paper highlights the importance of understanding the involvement of the brain in EDS. The review highlights the need for a shift in approach to EDS, and an integrated effort across neurology, psychiatry, and genetics to better support those living EDS.

Indexed as

anxietycerebrovascularChiari malformationchronic painEhlers Danlos syndromeemotional dysregulationinteroception

Identifiers

PMID41245867
PMCPMC12615174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.