ArticleDiscover public health2025
Lessons from community during COVID-19: understanding needs and preferences for the development of a disease prevention and health promotion initiative.
Article in Discover public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many patients face barriers when it comes to confident healthcare decision making. During the COVID-19 pandemic, individuals had to weigh the risks and benefits of potential health risks, and scientists had the challenge of summarizing and communicating risks from various scientific domains. Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) methodology combines the concerns and expertise of researchers and community members to improve health. This study aimed to (1) identify topics and methods for delivering health information about COVID-19 through mixed methods of (a) quantitatively examining reasons for and against vaccination and testing and trusted sources of information and (b) qualitatively examining intervention preferences, and (2) to design an intervention based on the needs and preferences of the community and in partnership with community health champions. Quantitative data illustrated concerns related to testing, vaccination, and trust that impacted school community members' willingness to engage in healthy behaviors. Qualitative data demonstrated that key intervention preferences of school community members included transparency of health messaging, messaging from trusted sources of information, desire for general health information, caution with incentives and mandates, and formatting the intervention for the audience. These data informed a customized town-hall style intervention to increase knowledge and confidence in COVID-19 health decision-making for parents. This study demonstrates the importance of understanding community needs, identifying strategies that promote trust, and collaborating with communities to prevent disease, promote health, and enhance health equity. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12982-025-01059-7.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.