ArticleSSM - population health2025
Examining the reversal hypothesis on socioeconomic status and noncommunicable diseases, and gender disparities in China: a nationwide longitudinal analysis between 1991 and 2020.
Article in SSM - population health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The term "reversal hypothesis" has been attached to the observation that the socio-economic status (SES) gradient of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) tends to reverse over time as country's economic and social development progresses. We examined this hypothesis in China between 1991 and 2020, to test whether a divergence in the experiences of men and women can be identified and to explore the possible contributors to any disparity. Methods: Using nine waves of China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS, 1991-2015) and six waves of the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS, 2010-2020), we investigated the SES-NCD gradient among participants aged 18 years and older. We examined the relationship between self-reported doctor diagnosed NCDs and SES proxied by formal educational years by gender using multivariable logistic regression and Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition models. Findings: Prevalence of a list of NCDs in the overall population increased from 3.52 % (1991) to 13.72 % (2020). The association between SES and NCDs has shifted from positive to negative over time, shifting earlier among women compared to men. For both men and women, the difference in prevalence between high and low SES groups was mostly explained by the socio-demographic and risk behaviour variables included in the models: age, being overweight/obesity, employment status, residency, and region. However, the contribution size of these factors and consistency was different by gender and changed over time. Conclusions: China has experienced a reversal in the SES-NCD gradient which occurred first among women. The explanations of SES differences are complex and differ by gender.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.