ArticlePerspectives on medical education2025
Exploring Complexity in Out-of-Hospital Clinical Supervision Using Rich Pictures.
Article in Perspectives on medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The rapidly evolving healthcare landscape in which physicians work and learn is becoming increasingly complex. This growing complexity presents challenges for supervisors and learners, who must balance autonomy with ensuring patient safety. The authors investigated how Elderly Care Medicine and General Practice trainees and supervisors perceive complexity in out-of-hospital settings. The results could contribute to improving the learning and supervision of trainees in complex situations. Method: From a constructivist paradigm, the authors applied "Rich Pictures" to explore participants' experiences. Via training institutions, participants were purposefully sampled until data were sufficient to answer the research question. Data collection took place through drawing of supervised complex care situations, directly followed by semi-structured interviews. The authors conducted a reflexive thematic analysis. They analyzed data iteratively, both individually and in "Gallery walks". Through consultation and discussion, consensus was reached. Results: Participants described complexity as an intricate interplay of multiple problems in multiple dimensions, where the network of various systems and stakeholders surrounding patients and their interactions and relationships have a major influence on how complexity is perceived. Human interaction was a significant contributor here. For trainees and supervisors, factors related to their working experience and the trainee-supervisor relationship could make a situation more complex. Discussion: While literature in the field of medical education on complexity mainly describes medical, psychosocial and
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.