Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41245709›Full record

ReviewJournal of experimental orthopaedics2025

Adjuvant injection therapies following knee cartilage repair demonstrate heterogeneous evidence: A systematic review.

Max Alfredo Saráchaga Mendoza, Philipp Niemeyer, Alexander Bumberger, Peter Angele, Philip P Roessler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Max Alfredo Saráchaga MendozaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery Hospital General de México Dr. Eduardo Liceaga Mexico City Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0559-9988
Philipp NiemeyerOrthopädische Chirurgie München (OCM) Munich Germany.
Alexander BumbergerDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9438-0718
Peter AngeleSporthopaedicum Regensburg/Straubing Regensburg Germany.
Philip P RoesslerGelenkzentrum Mittelrhein Koblenz Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1574-0111

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this study was to systematically review the existing literature related to adjuvant injection therapies among patients with cartilage defects of the knee joint who have undergone bone marrow stimulation procedures and ascertain their potential clinical benefits. Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a search was conducted on PubMed and the Cochrane Library to identify articles documenting the utilization of adjuvant injection therapies after surgery for cartilage defects, with a minimum short-term follow-up. Animal studies, uncontrolled trials, studies lacking primary surgical intervention or those including patients with osteoarthritis were excluded. Results: Twelve articles focusing on knee cartilage defects were analysed (531 patients). Platelet-rich plasma was used in eight studies, mesenchymal stromal cells in four and hyaluronic acid in one. Injection frequency and timing varied, with the most common timing being during surgery. Primary outcome measures included subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores. Subjective IKDC showed significant difference in five out of nine studies and VAS in three out of eight studies, favouring injection therapy groups. Conclusion: The present review demonstrates a large heterogeneity among included studies regarding surgical interventions, injection strategies and timing as well as outcome measures. While several studies suggest a potential benefit of adjuvant therapies, findings remain inconsistent. Due to the limited quality and comparability of the evidence, no definitive recommendations can be made at this time, highlighting the need for standardized protocols and high-quality randomized controlled trials. Level of Evidence: Level IV.

Indexed as

cartilage defectshyaluronic acidmesenchymal stromal cellsmicrofracturesplatelet‐rich plasma

Identifiers

PMID41245709
PMCPMC12616273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.