ArticleClinical case reports2025
Removal of Extraradicular Separated Instrument by Targeted Endodontic Microsurgery Using the 3D-Printed Guide and Trephine: A Case Report.
Article in Clinical case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital 3D-Printed Surgical Guide for Removal of a Separated Instrument at the Maxillary Sinus Floor and Apical Microsurgery.Journal of medical cases · 2026Article
- Removal of Extraradicular Separated Instrument by Targeted Endodontic Microsurgery Using the 3D-Printed Guide and Trephine: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This case report aimed to present an accurate and minimally invasive approach to retrieve a separated instrument beyond the apical foramen, using a 3-dimensional (3D) printing guide and trephine bur. A 31-year-old female patient was referred for treatment of the left maxillary central incisor, complaining that a fractured file had been pushed out of the root canal by her previous dentist approximately 2 weeks prior. On clinical examination, tooth #9 was temporarily sealed and slightly tender on percussion. Periodontal probing was within normal limits. Radiographic and cone-beam computed tomographic imaging revealed a periapical radiolucent lesion at tooth #9, with a separated instrument approximately 3 mm long extruded approximately 2 mm beyond the apical foramen and 4 mm deep in the bone. The tooth was diagnosed with symptomatic apical periodontitis. After root canal treatment, endodontic surgery was performed to retrieve the extraradicular separated instrument with the aid of a 3D printing guide and trephine bur. The root end was ultrasonically prepared and retrograde filled. The patient was asymptomatic when recalled 3 months and 2 years after the surgery, and the follow-up periapical radiograph showed successful healing of the periapical lesion. This method enables a single-step operation, completing the removal of the extraradicular separated instrument while performing osteotomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.