ReviewNPP - digital psychiatry and neuroscience2025
Breaking barriers: centering researchers with lived experience in psychiatric neuroscience.
Review in NPP - digital psychiatry and neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Price and Prize for Employment or Education: a Qualitative Study Examining Facilitators and Barriers from the Perspectives of Service Providers working in Supported Employment and Education and Experts by Experience with Psychosis Spectrum Disorders.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2026Article
- On the need and contents of a specific addiction recovery research agenda.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2026Article
- Further expanding the addiction recovery research agenda: Institutions, populations and workforce.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Researchers with lived experience (RWLE) of serious mental illness or substance use disorders (SMI/SUD) bring critical dual expertise to psychiatric neuroscience as both scientists and individuals directly affected by the conditions they study. Yet their participation and leadership remain profoundly limited by entrenched stigma, disclosure risks that can obstruct promising career trajectories, lack of mentorship from senior RWLE, and the absence of structural protections against discrimination and exclusion. These systemic barriers silence voices that can help transform the field's understanding of mental illness and its biological underpinnings. Drawing on the authors' lived and/or professional experiences, this Perspective challenges the assumption that lived experience introduces bias, reframing it as a source of empirical strength, innovation, and epistemic diversity. Here, the authors propose structural reforms to reshape admissions, mentorship, and leadership pathways. Centering RWLE is both a scientific necessity and an ethical imperative for advancing a more equitable and representative psychiatric neuroscience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.