ArticleRadiologia brasileira
Association between abnormalities on chest computed tomography and pulmonary function in patients with respiratory symptoms at 12 months after COVID-19.
Article in Radiologia brasileira. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To assess the prevalence and type of residual lung abnormalities on chest computed tomography (CT) and pulmonary function testing (PFT) variables in patients with respiratory symptoms related to post-COVID-19 condition at 12 months of follow-up, and to analyze associations between CT findings and PFT parameters. Materials and Methods: The CT findings were evaluated by two radiologists, who calculated semiquantitative CT scores. The PFTs included spirometry, plethysmography, and the diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide. Results: Thirty-seven patients were included in the study. On CT scans of the chest acquired at 12 months of follow-up, 78.3% of the patients exhibited residual abnormalities, including reticular opacities, in 75.7%; traction bronchiectasis/bronchiolectasis, in 43.2%; and fibrosis-like findings, in 43.2%. The mean overall CT score was 9.30 ± 2.59. Patients with fibrosis-like findings had significantly lower total lung capacity (68.6% vs. 80.6% of the predicted value; Conclusion: It seems that a significant proportion of patients with respiratory symptoms related to post-COVID-19 condition demonstrate residual lung abnormalities on chest CT at 12 months of follow-up, with a substantial prevalence of fibrosis-like findings. Such abnormalities are associated with restrictive lung disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.