Adaptive designs in randomized clinical trials: reanalysis of the HOVON87/NMSG18 multiple myeloma trial.

Background: Randomized controlled trials are the gold standard to assess clinical efficacy of novel drugs, but improved survival extends follow-up time and challenges their feasibility. Adaptive trial designs, offering earlier outcome assessments, may enhance efficiency and accelerate decision-making. We retrospectively evaluated whether applying adaptive designs to the randomized HOVON87/NMSG18 phase III trial (inclusion between January 2009 and October 2012), which failed to meet its primary endpoint, could have indicated futility earlier. Methods: We modelled two adaptive trial designs: (1) group sequential and (2) sample size re-estimation. Each design recommends early trial termination for strong efficacy or futility, or continuation if signals are inconclusive. Interim analyses for the group sequential design were defined at 33% and 67% of events required for the final analysis, using O'Brien-Fleming, Pocock, and gamma spending functions to control for false positive or negative results. Sample size re-estimation design was evaluated after 67% of events. Findings: Interpretation: This reanalysis of a MM trial suggests that adaptive designs indicate earlier futility detection and thereby facilitate decision-making. Early signals could reduce follow-up time or potentially offer sample size expansion if the effect is promising but not yet conclusive. Our findings highlight the value of implementing adaptive designs to enhance the efficiency and ethical conduct of future RCTs. Funding: The HOVON87/NMSG18 trial was supported by Dutch Cancer Society grant 2008-4246, the Norwegian Cancer Society and Celgene.