ArticleAnimal reproduction2025
Establishment of a mouse embryo bank at ICTB/FIOCRUZ: vitrification of genetically modified strains.
Article in Animal reproduction, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To establish a mouse embryo bank at the Institute of Science and Technology in Biomodels, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (ICTB/FIOCRUZ), embryos from genetically modified strains were vitrified. The strains included B6.129SVEV-CCBP2 (D6), B6.129P2-Nos2 (Nos2), B6.129S2-Cd28 (Cd28), B6.129P2-Ccl3 (Ccl3), B6.129S2-Alox5 (Alox5), B6.129P2-Ccr2 (Ccr2), B6.129P2-Ccr5 (Ccr5) and B6.129S1-Tlr6 (Tlr6). To accomplish this, the animals were superovulated and mated, and their embryos were collected and vitrified. The success of the technique was evaluated by examining the development of the embryos through thawing and in vitro culture, comparing them to a control group. The results were analyzed using percentages, Tukey's t-test, and Analysis of Variance. The embryonic development percentages for the different strains were as follows: D6 (55%), Nos2 (24.7%), Cd28 (45.8%), Ccl3 (50%), Alox5 (4.8%), Ccr2 (66.7%), Ccr5 (63.04%) and Tlr6 (52.8%). Significant differences were observed between the strains Nos2 (p=0.0434), Cd28 (p=0.034), Ccl3 (p=0.0006), and Alox5 (p=0.0166) compared to their respective control groups. In conclusion, the strains Ccr2 (p= p=0.0889), Ccr5 (p=0.0806), D6(p=0,0685) and Tlr6 (p=0.0806) demonstrated favorable results in terms of the vitrification protocol and subsequent embryonic development, as they did not significantly differ from the control groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.