ArticleJournal of healthcare leadership2025
Predictors of Perceived Organizational Innovation Among Allied Health and Pharmacy Professionals.
Article in Journal of healthcare leadership, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Rising healthcare costs have intensified the need for innovation within healthcare systems, with organizational innovation being seen as a key enabler for the development of strategies to improve affordability and accessibility for long-term sustainable health care delivery. While research has long examined innovation among physicians and nurses, studies focusing on Allied Health Professionals (AHPs) and pharmacists are nascent. This study investigates the innovation culture among AHPs and pharmacists in Singapore's largest healthcare cluster. It specifically examines how components of the Innovation Quotient model-Values, Behaviors, Climate, Processes, Resources, and Success-predict perceived changes in innovation. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was distributed via Email to 4413 AHPs and pharmacists, yielding 620 complete responses. The survey instrument, the InnoQuotient, comprised 54 items categorized into 18 factors that correspond to six building blocks of innovation. Structural equation modeling (SEM) in R Studio evaluated model fit and the relationships between these factors and self-reported change in innovation. Complementing the quantitative analysis, a thematic analysis was conducted using MAXQDA on 65 verbatim responses. Results: SEM analysis indicated that three innovation building blocks of Conclusion: The findings advocate for a balanced approach that synergizes leadership direction with organic, collaborative efforts to cultivate a robust innovation culture. Future studies should focus on refining strategies to bolster less effective innovation components and include perspectives across different organizational levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.