ArticleEcology and evolution2025
The Perception of Cultural Ecosystem Services by Tourists in Brazilian Protected Areas.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Perception of Cultural Ecosystem Services by Tourists in Brazilian Protected Areas.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protected areas play a crucial role in biodiversity conservation, nature tourism, and the provision of ecosystem services, with cultural ecosystem services shaping key human-nature interactions. Understanding how visitors perceive these protected areas, whether positively or negatively, is essential for supporting their conservation. This study investigates tourists' perceptions of cultural ecosystem services in 27 Strictly Protected Areas in southeastern Brazil, based on TripAdvisor reviews. Nouns were categorized into four main aspects: structural (physical attributes), aesthetic (nature experiences), sociocultural (culture, religiosity, education) and recreational (leisure activities). Adjectives were classified as positive or negative. Positive adjectives were predominantly associated with all aspects, particularly aesthetics and structure. Structural aspects were more frequently associated with negative descriptors, while aesthetic and sociocultural aspects received fewer negative associations than expected by chance. Additionally, sociocultural and recreational aspects also received little attention. These results suggest that tourists are mainly attracted to the natural aesthetic qualities of protected areas, followed by structural features. This positive relationship between tourists and nature has implications for strengthening conservation efforts, emphasizing the value of natural beauty and well-maintained infrastructure. Furthermore, incorporating sociocultural elements into management practices could foster stronger collaboration between managers and local communities, promoting a more inclusive and sustainable approach to protected area management. Ultimately, the study highlights the importance of integrating natural, structural, and cultural elements into conservation strategies to improve both ecological preservation and local community involvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.