ArticleTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology2025
Integrated analysis of the safety of fecal microbiota, live-jslm in adults with recurrent
Article in Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 2 Open-label Clinical Trial Demonstrating the Safety of RBX2660 Microbiota Suspension for the Treatment of Recurrent Clostridium Difficile-associated Diarrhea (CDAD): the PUNCH CD Study
A Phase 2B Prospective, Randomized, Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled Clinical Study Demonstrating the Efficacy and Safety of Rebiotix RBX2660 (Microbiota Suspension) for the Treatment of Recurrent Clostridium Difficile Infection
An Open-label Efficacy and Safety Assessment of Rebiotix RBX2660 (Microbiota Suspension) for the Treatment of Recurrent Clostridium Difficile Infection
A Phase 3 Prospective, Randomized, Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of RBX2660 (Microbiota Suspension) for the Prevention of Clostridium Difficile Infection
A Phase 3 Open-Label Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Rebiotix RBX2660 (Microbiota Suspension) in Subjects With Recurrent Clostridium Difficile Infection
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of fecal microbiota, live (RBL) for the prevention of recurrentJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Fecal microbiota, live-jslm (RBL) is approved in the United States and Canada for prevention of recurrent Objectives: Provide an updated integrated safety analysis, incorporating final safety data from Punch CD3-OLS. Design: Safety data were combined from five RBL trials: three phase II and two phase III trials. Methods: Adult participants had documented rCDI and completed SOC therapy before receiving one or two doses of RBL or placebo, rectally administered as one treatment course. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were recorded for ⩽6 months. Results: TEAEs were reported in 70.9% (845/1192) of RBL recipients; most TEAEs were mild to moderate and gastrointestinal in nature. Most serious TEAEs were related to preexisting conditions or CDI. There was no clustering of serious TEAEs. Most TEAEs leading to death were related to preexisting conditions. Conclusion: Overall, data demonstrate RBL has a favorable 6-month safety profile. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01925417; NCT02299570; NCT02589847; NCT03244644; NCT03931941.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.