ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
The "inverted-U" of cognitive effort across speech rates holds for simple but not complex sentence structures.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pupil dilation has become a well-established physiological index of cognitive effort. Here we examined the often-cited finding of an inverted U-shaped function of pupil size across the continuum from highly degraded to clear speech. Unlike the short sentences with simple syntax as used in the original inverted-U demonstrations, 32 young adults recalled sentences with subject-relative embedded clause structures and more syntactically complex object-relative embedded clause structures. Sentences were degraded using time-compression and presented at 10, 25, 35 and 100% of their normal playing time selected from a preliminary calibration study. Subject-relative sentences showed an approximately symmetrical inverted U-shaped function across speech rates, but object-relative sentences failed to show the drop in pupil size with normal-rate speech. We conclude that the symmetric inverted U-shaped function of pupil size with increasing speech quality is limited to sentences with simple syntax. We thus offer a more complete picture of the inverted-U than currently in the literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.