ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Living and learning with a blind mind's eye: college students with aphantasia.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vividness of visual imagery is associated with perceived clarity of recall but not with accuracy during exams.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Leaving space for imagination: mental imagery-informed teaching framework for enhancing imagery vividness in creative writing.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Aphantasia, the inability to voluntarily generate visual mental imagery, affects approximately 2-5% of the population. The current study investigated how college students with aphantasia navigate academic environments despite lacking this cognitive ability, which is traditionally considered fundamental to learning. Method: Study 1 quantitatively examined relationships between visual imagery ability and academic variables among 450 college students, while Study 2 qualitatively explored the experiences of 14 aphantasic college students through semi-structured interviews. Results: While hyperphantasic students demonstrated significantly higher episodic memory, future thinking ability, and greater use of certain study behaviors (practice testing and explanation generation), no significant differences emerged in deep, strategic, or surface learning approaches. Qualitative analyses revealed four major compensatory mechanisms: (1) extensive externalization through list-making and organizational systems; (2) systematic verbal processing strategies; (3) anchoring new information to familiar references; and (4) multi-modal approaches to visual-heavy content. Conclusion: These findings demonstrate that aphantasic students systematically externalize cognitive processes that others typically internalize through visualization. Despite lacking mental imagery, these compensatory strategies enable aphantasics to perform academically as well as their peers. This research highlights the brain's remarkable adaptability and suggests approaches for creating more inclusive learning environments that accommodate diverse cognitive profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.