Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41245333›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Living and learning with a blind mind's eye: college students with aphantasia.

Jenel T Cavazos, Hannah M Baskin, Taylor M Mashigian, M Anthony Cavazos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jenel T CavazosDepartment of Psychology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, United States.
Hannah M BaskinDepartment of Psychology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, United States.
Taylor M MashigianDepartment of Psychology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, United States.
M Anthony CavazosDepartment of Communication, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Aphantasia, the inability to voluntarily generate visual mental imagery, affects approximately 2-5% of the population. The current study investigated how college students with aphantasia navigate academic environments despite lacking this cognitive ability, which is traditionally considered fundamental to learning. Method: Study 1 quantitatively examined relationships between visual imagery ability and academic variables among 450 college students, while Study 2 qualitatively explored the experiences of 14 aphantasic college students through semi-structured interviews. Results: While hyperphantasic students demonstrated significantly higher episodic memory, future thinking ability, and greater use of certain study behaviors (practice testing and explanation generation), no significant differences emerged in deep, strategic, or surface learning approaches. Qualitative analyses revealed four major compensatory mechanisms: (1) extensive externalization through list-making and organizational systems; (2) systematic verbal processing strategies; (3) anchoring new information to familiar references; and (4) multi-modal approaches to visual-heavy content. Conclusion: These findings demonstrate that aphantasic students systematically externalize cognitive processes that others typically internalize through visualization. Despite lacking mental imagery, these compensatory strategies enable aphantasics to perform academically as well as their peers. This research highlights the brain's remarkable adaptability and suggests approaches for creating more inclusive learning environments that accommodate diverse cognitive profiles.

Indexed as

aphantasiacollege studentshyperphantasiastudent successvisual imagery

Identifiers

PMID41245333
PMCPMC12612682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.