ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2025
Outcomes of Pre-operative Planning using 3D Printed Models Versus Radiographic Assessment in Surgical Treatment of Proximal Tibia Fracture: A Comparative Study.
Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: 3D printing is a latest technique used in planning fracture management which helps to plan accurate surgery leading to better results than traditional management of fractures. Materials and Methods: In this randomised-controlled trial, 30 patients between 18 and 65 years of age having proximal tibia fractures AO type 41B and 41C were included. They were divided into two groups, 15 cases each of 3D model group and traditional surgery group. The 3D model group were assessed pre-operatively with 3D printed model and pre-operative planning was done using the model, whilst the traditional surgery group of patients were assessed pre-operatively with radiological assessment like X-rays and 3D Reconstruction CT scan. Both groups were then subjected to standard surgical management. Operative time, blood loss, and number of intra-operative fluoroscopy were recorded. Through the follow-up, the recovery of patients was observed. Results: The functional outcomes of surgically treated tibial plateau fractures were assessed using HSS scores which was better in the 3D-Group than the traditional group. Operative time, blood loss, and number of intra-operative fluoroscopy were less in 3D model group than traditional group. The P value was highly significant in HSS scores, operative time, blood loss, and number of intra-operative fluoroscopy between 3D model group and traditional surgery group. Conclusion: This study showed that use of 3D printing pre-operatively gives better result than traditional surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.