ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2025
Cryptococcosis in patients with myasthenia gravis: clinical characteristics and management strategy.
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cryptococcosis, while well-documented in immunocompromised hosts, remains a rare complication in myasthenia gravis (MG) patients undergoing immunosuppressive therapy. Methods: We reported three cases of cryptococcal infection in MG patients diagnosed via cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) testing and/or histopathology, coupled with a comprehensive literature review of 14 additional cases that highlights the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in this population. We also explored potential immunodeficiency by whole-exome sequencing (WES). Results: The comibined cohort (median age 57.1 years) demonstrated predominant central nervous system (52.9%), pulmonary (47.1%), and cutaneous (23.5%) involvement, with disseminated disease correlating with markedly decreased CD4+ T cells counts. Diagnostic complexity arose from imaging findings mimicking malignancies. A heterozygous FAS mutation (p.S19L) was identified by WES in one of our patients; however, its association with cryptococcal infection remains unclear. Management required tailored antifungal regimens (amphotericin B, fluconazole, flucytosine) and careful therapeutic drug monitoring to address immunosuppressant interactions. Four patients received surgical management targeting the local lesions. Most cases achieved clinical resolution. Conclusion: The management of cryptococcal infection in patients with MG poses significant challenges in the context of underlying immune dysfunction and the use of immunosuppressive therapy. Within this complex clinical scenario, early recognition, multidisciplinary care, and individualized treatment strategies are paramount. They underscore the need for heightened clinical vigilance and further research to optimize outcomes in this vulnerable patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.