Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41245227›Full record

ArticleAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2025

Comparing Temporal Trends in Aesthetic Surgery Fellowship Match Statistics in Plastic Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery, and Oculofacial Surgery.

Isaac B James, Pierce L Janssen, Elad Fraiman, Marjorie C Kragel, Huijun Xiao, James E Zins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Isaac B James
Pierce L Janssen
Elad Fraiman
Huijun Xiao
James E Zins

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Aesthetic plastic surgery fellowships endorsed by The Aesthetic Society participated in the San Francisco (SF) Match in 2017 to 2018. Despite streamlined applications and increases in available positions, participating applicants did not increase through the 2022 match cycle. Objectives: The authors of this study compare match statistics for aesthetic plastic surgery, facial plastic surgery, and oculofacial surgery, with analysis extended through the 2025 match cycle. Methods: SF Match data for aesthetic plastic surgery (2018-2025), facial plastic surgery (2018-2024), and oculofacial surgery (2018-2024) were analyzed. Relevant data included the number of participating programs, positions, applicants, filled positions, and match rates. The 2017 to 2024 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Data Resource Books provided resident graduation data by subspecialty. Results: Aesthetic plastic surgery positions increased significantly ( Conclusions: Efforts to improve the postgraduate plastic surgery aesthetic application process and training model have had a significant, although delayed, impact on application numbers. Applications to facial plastic surgery and oculofacial surgery fellowships have seen only nominal increases during the same time period. Previously, facial plastic surgery fellowships greatly outnumbered aesthetic plastic surgery fellowships. This gap has now significantly narrowed. Oculofacial surgery fellowships remain highly competitive and limited in numbers. Level of Evidence: 5 (Therapeutic).

Identifiers

PMID41245227
PMCPMC12614165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.