ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2025
Bringing a socially assistive robot to the paediatric emergency department: design, development, and usability testing.
Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Children undergoing medical procedures in paediatric Emergency Departments (EDs) often experience significant pain and distress. Socially Assistive Robots (SARs) offer a promising avenue for delivering distraction and emotional support in these high-pressure environments. This study presents the design, development, and formative evaluation of an AI-enhanced SAR to support children during intravenous insertion (IVI) procedures. Methods: The robot system was developed through a participatory design process involving healthcare professionals, patients, caregivers, and interdisciplinary research teams. The SAR was designed to autonomously adapt its behaviour to the child's affective state using AI planning and social signal processing. A two-cycle usability study was conducted across two Canadian paediatric EDs, involving 25 children and their caregivers. Feedback was collected through observations, interviews, and system logs. Results: The SAR was successfully integrated into clinical workflows, with positive responses from children, caregivers, and healthcare providers. Usability testing identified key technical and interaction challenges, which were addressed through iterative refinement. The final system demonstrated robust performance and was deemed ready for a formal randomised controlled trial. Discussion: This work highlights the importance of co-design, operator control, and environmental adaptability in deploying SARs in clinical settings. Lessons learned from the development and deployment process informed six concrete design guidelines for future SAR implementations in healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.