ArticleJournal of tissue engineering
CRISPRa genome-wide screen identifies novel gene targets for osteogenic cell engineering.
Article in Journal of tissue engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genome-wide CRISPR interference screen identifies Clip2 as a novel regulator of osteocyte maturation and morphology.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2026Article
- ZNF865 (BLST) Regulates Back Pain via Cell Senescence and DNA Damage Mechanisms.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Synergistic Wnt/BMP Co-activation accelerates osteogenic differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells via paraxial mesoderm induction.Journal of tissue engineeringArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bone tissue regeneration and fracture healing remain a significant challenge for physicians, with nonunion failures occurring in an estimated 5%-10% of bone-healing treatments. The autologous bone graft has long been the gold standard of treatment. However, these procedures suffer from persistent donor-site morbidity and extended surgery times, while still having high revision and nonunion failure rates. Cell therapies and tissue engineering strategies utilizing stem cells have been considered as promising alternatives to autologous bone grafts. Here, we explore the concept of using CRISPR-activation (CRISPRa) as a cell-engineering tool to drive osteogenesis without exogenous growth factors. We present a genome-wide CRISPRa screen in adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) to identify upregulation targets that drive osteogenesis. Top targets from the screen, SPRED2 and ATXN7L3B, demonstrated significant increases in alkaline phosphatase activity and mineralization in monolayer and 3D culture. These results are the first evidence of these genes as osteogenic targets in ASCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.