ArticleJAMIA open2025
Co-design of clinician-facing report and implementation pathway for a digital questionnaire for reporting head and neck cancer symptoms.
Article in JAMIA open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This research aimed to design and evaluate a clinician-facing report generated from the SYmptom iNput Clinical (SYNC) system, a digital questionnaire for patients to report Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) symptoms and uses this to calculate a risk score. The research explored how the SYNC system could be integrated into existing hospital workflows. Materials and Methods: The research comprised two studies conducted across three hospital settings. Study 1 focused on design and evaluation of the clinician-facing report, while Study 2 explored pathways for integrating the SYNC system into clinical workflows. Data collection involved six focus groups, two conducted in each hospital setting with clinicians and administrative staff involved in cancer management, to capture diverse perspectives on both the report and integration feasibility. Results: Study 1 participants emphasised the need for clear and concise presentation of critical information in the report, yet there were also differing perspectives on what constituted clear and concise presentation. Study 2 participants suggested that effective integration of the SYNC system into hospital workflows would depend on ensuring that the system is user-friendly and adaptable, to help maintain clinician engagement and support better patient management. Conclusions: Engaging a range of stakeholders, not just the end user, is crucial to gaining an understanding of the patient pathway and implementation challenges that may appear at each point, supporting the development of digital tools that are both functional and well-integrated into clinical workflows. This approach enhances usability and ensures the SYNC system can support the management of HNC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.