Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41245150›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2025

Co-design of clinician-facing report and implementation pathway for a digital questionnaire for reporting head and neck cancer symptoms.

Chinasa Odo, Nikki Rousseau, Joanne Patterson, Vinidh Paleri, Theofano Tikka, Clare Schilling, Rebecca Randell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chinasa OdoCentre for Digital Innovations in Health & Social Care, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 1DP, United Kingdom.
Nikki RousseauLeeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9NL, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8826-3515
Joanne PattersonUniversity of Liverpool, Liverpool L3 5TR, United Kingdom.
Vinidh PaleriThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SW3 6JJ, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7933-4585
Theofano TikkaSt George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London SW17 0QT, United Kingdom.
Clare SchillingUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London NW1 2PG, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8852-1270
Rebecca RandellCentre for Digital Innovations in Health & Social Care, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 1DP, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5856-4912

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This research aimed to design and evaluate a clinician-facing report generated from the SYmptom iNput Clinical (SYNC) system, a digital questionnaire for patients to report Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) symptoms and uses this to calculate a risk score. The research explored how the SYNC system could be integrated into existing hospital workflows. Materials and Methods: The research comprised two studies conducted across three hospital settings. Study 1 focused on design and evaluation of the clinician-facing report, while Study 2 explored pathways for integrating the SYNC system into clinical workflows. Data collection involved six focus groups, two conducted in each hospital setting with clinicians and administrative staff involved in cancer management, to capture diverse perspectives on both the report and integration feasibility. Results: Study 1 participants emphasised the need for clear and concise presentation of critical information in the report, yet there were also differing perspectives on what constituted clear and concise presentation. Study 2 participants suggested that effective integration of the SYNC system into hospital workflows would depend on ensuring that the system is user-friendly and adaptable, to help maintain clinician engagement and support better patient management. Conclusions: Engaging a range of stakeholders, not just the end user, is crucial to gaining an understanding of the patient pathway and implementation challenges that may appear at each point, supporting the development of digital tools that are both functional and well-integrated into clinical workflows. This approach enhances usability and ensures the SYNC system can support the management of HNC patients.

Indexed as

clinical reportcliniciandigital questionnairehospitalimplementation

Identifiers

PMID41245150
PMCPMC12612671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.