ArticleSurgical case reports2025
Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration for Choledocholithiasis in a Patient with Situs Inversus Totalis and Prior Total Gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y Reconstruction: A Case Report.
Article in Surgical case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy with common bile duct exploration in situs inverse totalis: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Case Report: Laparoscopic appendectomy in a patient with congenital visceral heterotaxy and severe adhesions.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSitus inversus totalis (SIT) is a rare congenital condition characterized by mirror-image transposition of the thoracic and abdominal viscera. Herein, we report a rare case of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with choledochotomy and stone extraction in a patient with SIT and a history of total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y (R-Y) reconstruction. CASE PRESENTATION: A 70-year-old woman with SIT and a history of total gastrectomy with R-Y reconstruction presented with recurrent cholangitis caused by choledocholithiasis. Conservative therapy led to temporary improvement, but symptoms recurred after 2 months. Percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage was followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) one week later. Dense adhesions along the midline and right upper quadrant prevented standard port placement, so all maneuvers were confined to the left abdomen. A 3-cm umbilical minilaparotomy accommodated a Lap Protector with two 5-mm working ports, and additional 5-mm ports were inserted in the left lower abdomen for the camera, in the left upper abdomen for the assistant, and above the choledochotomy site for choledochoscope access. CT confirmed complete SIT and an 18-mm common bile duct (CBD) stone with upstream dilation. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was impossible because the long Roux limb and adhesions limited endoscopic access. Choledochotomy was aided by traction sutures; the impacted stone was fragmented intraductally and retrieved with basket forceps. The CBD was closed primarily without drainage. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged on day 8. No complications occurred during the 4-week follow-up.
conclusionsThis case emphasizes the technical challenges of laparoscopic biliary surgery in patients with situs inversus and a history of R-Y reconstruction. The key points include individualized port placement, surgeon positioning, traction, and secure primary closure. LCBDE is feasible in patients with SIT and prior R-Y reconstruction if surgical strategies are individualized based on anatomical variation and surgical history.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.