Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41245071›Full record

ArticleGlobal qualitative nursing research

Strategies for Implementing Research Inspired Teaching in Higher Education for Midwifery and Nursing: A Qualitative Study Introducing the 4M Model.

Elina Leiviska, Sally Pezaro, Luca Morini, Alun DeWinter, Rosie Kneafsey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global qualitative nursing research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elina LeiviskaCoventry University, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7778-0698
Sally PezaroCoventry University, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5767-0708
Luca MoriniCoventry University, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9391-0481
Alun DeWinterLoughborough University, United Kingdom.
Rosie KneafseyCoventry University, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6613-5296

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Integrating research and evidence into teaching promotes critical thinking, problem solving and innovation, but challenges remain in identifying the most effective methods. The Research Inspired Online/Offline Teaching (RIOT) framework presents a solution for midwifery and nursing education, but its applicability and feasibility must first be tested. This study investigated factors influencing the implementation of the RIOT framework and proposed solutions for overcoming barriers. Semi-structured interviews and qualitative surveys were conducted with academic staff, and educational managers and leaders in a university in the United Kingdom between February and June 2024. Twenty-four interviews and six qualitative survey responses were analysed using framework and thematic analysis. Framework analysis identified barriers and solutions at five levels: individual, interpersonal, organisational, institutional and societal. Thematic analysis formed four overarching themes: (1) understanding the relevance of research, (2) knowledge, skills, tools and confidence to apply research into teaching, (3) establishing a collaborative research culture and (4) overcoming challenges impacting the ability to maintain teaching excellence. The 4M Model for Promoting Research Inspired Teaching in Midwifery and Nursing Education was developed from the findings to provide a foundation for facilitating research integration via the RIOT framework. The 4M model emphasises the necessity for collaboration, optimisation of research impact, cultivation of a collaborative research culture, and maintenance of teaching excellence.

Indexed as

evidence-based practicemidwifery and nursing educationqualitative researchresearch inspired teachingUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID41245071
PMCPMC12612518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.