ArticleJPGN reports2025
Long-term outcomes of intensive multidisciplinary intervention for feeding tube dependence and chronic food refusal.
Article in JPGN reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the long-term follow-up status of patients with a history of feeding tube dependence who completed a multidisciplinary, day treatment program. Method: We conducted a 17-item Qualtrics survey of patients who participated in treatment to improve the volume and variety of solid food intake and replace enteral feeding due to chronic food refusal an average of 6 years following intervention. Results: Of the 81 patients included in the original outcome study, 75 met eligibility criteria; 36 caregivers (48%) completed the survey. Survey respondents and non-respondents were similar in terms of patient demographics and status at discharge. Most patients (80%) who achieved full wean from feeding tube dependence at program discharge maintained their wean at the time of the survey. Most caregivers (89%) described their child's relationship with food as "good" or "neutral". Discussion: Intensive multidisciplinary intervention holds benefits for children with complex feeding problems, including advancing the volume and variety of food consumed during meals and reducing the need for enteral feeding. The durability of these benefits, however, is not well understood. The current follow-up survey of patients who completed an intensive feeding program suggests that treatment gains, such as the reduction of tube dependency, endure for most patients. Conclusion: Our findings provide provisional evidence of the long-term effectiveness of our intensive multidisciplinary model in promoting oral intake and reducing tube dependence among young children with chronic food refusal. Future research should seek to better understand who benefits most from this model of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.