Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41244883›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of integrated care

Enhancing Volunteer Integration in Pediatric Care: Exploring Relationships, Facilitators, and Barriers.

Federico De Luca, Silvia Mitidieri, Cristina Masella

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Federico De LucaDepartment of Management Engineering, Department of Design, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2196-9139
Silvia MitidieriDepartment of Management Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9726-657X
Cristina MasellaDepartment of Management Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1758-7456

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The integration of volunteers into healthcare has become increasingly relevant for improving patient care and addressing systemic resource constraints. In pediatric settings, volunteers offer essential emotional and personalized support. However, their collaboration with healthcare professionals is often hindered by challenges such as role ambiguity, limited space, and insufficient communication. Description: This study investigates the dynamics of collaboration between healthcare professionals and volunteers in pediatric hospital care. Drawing on narrative interviews with 25 volunteers from an Italian organization, it explores lived experiences and identifies key factors shaping volunteer-professional interactions. The findings are categorized into two main dimensions: Discussion: Facilitators of effective collaboration include temporal continuity, access to dedicated spaces, shared training initiatives, and improved communication. Barriers such as staff turnover, lack of formal recognition, and unclear role boundaries can undermine volunteer engagement. Informal relationship-building and structured information sharing were found to enhance cooperation and care quality. Conclusion: The study highlights the need to strengthen both structural and relational aspects of volunteer integration in pediatric care. By addressing these dynamics, healthcare institutions can enhance volunteer contributions, improve patient experience, and support the broader implementation of integrated care models.

Indexed as

family supporthealth care provisionintegrated carepediatric carevolunteers

Identifiers

PMID41244883
PMCPMC12617419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.