ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Higher levels of eco-distress in psychotherapy out-patients with depressive and anxious symptoms are predicted by emotion regulation strategies.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Re-framing eco-distress for self-efficacy and resilience building.PLOS mental health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Psychotherapy patients are particularly vulnerable to the experience of eco-distress, often referred to as climate anxiety or eco-anxiety. Eco-distress can foster pro-environmental behavior, but its various symptoms might as well be functionally impairing and are negatively correlated with psychological well-being. The link between eco-distress and depressive and anxiety symptoms, as well as the use of dysfunctional emotion regulation strategies, may explain this vulnerability and suggest ways to promote resilience. Methods: Psychotherapy out-patients were screened at T1 ( Results: The EAQ-22 and GAD-7-C showed good model fit, the factorial structure of the CC-MMDS had to be adapted. Participants who screened positive for a generalized anxiety disorder and/or a depressive disorder at T1 reported higher levels of eco-distress, but changes in anxious or depressive symptoms from T1 to T2 did not predict a change in eco-distress. At T1, Conclusion: Eco-distress is associated with the frequent use of the emotion regulation strategies
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.