ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Impact on health outcomes and productive work of adding anti-PD-1 agents to treat early-stage cancers in the United Kingdom: a modelling study.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing the Impact on Health and Productivity Outcomes of Anti-PD-(L)1 Agents to Treat Early-Stage Cancers in Italy.Clinical drug investigation · 2026Article
- Assessing the health outcomes, productivity gains, and budget impact of anti-PD-(L)1's in the early stages of cancer treatment in Greece.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- The Health Impact of Using Anti-PD-1 Agents to Treat Early-Stage Cancer in Belgium.Oncology and therapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Anti-PD-1 agents are recommended in adjuvant or perioperative settings in some early-stage cancers. The health and productivity benefits of anti-PD-1 use on a population level, however, are unknown. Methods: A decision model was developed to quantify the health and productivity outcomes of adding anti-PD-1 agents to traditional management strategies in the adjuvant or perioperative setting for melanoma stage IIB/IIC/III, triple negative breast cancer, and renal cell carcinoma in the United Kingdom. The model consisted of four separate Markov models and compared outcomes in two scenarios: one where anti-PD-1 agents are restricted to advanced/metastatic disease, against one where anti-PD-1 agents are used as adjuvant or perioperative therapy for early-stage cancers. Population and incidence inputs were obtained from nation-specific sources, while efficacy and quality of life data were informed by the individual trials. Productivity outcomes were estimated using a human capital approach. Results: Between 2023 and 2032, 57,075 (60.4%) of 94,426 patients with early-stage cancers eligible for adjuvant or perioperative treatment are estimated to receive anti-PD-1 agents. This was associated with an increase in total life years (8,878, 2.4%), quality-adjusted life-years (9,029, 3.1%), and event-/disease-/recurrence-free life years (25,149, 9.0%), and a reduction in progression events or recurrences (6,839, 16.8%), active metastatic treatments (4,845, 14.0%), and deaths (3,013, 16.2%). The clinical benefits also resulted in a gain in productive years (20,717, 17.6%). Conclusion: The use of anti-PD-1 agents in adjuvant or perioperative settings can lead to substantial health and productivity gains. Effective planning and investment are needed for timely access to these agents for patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.