Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41244763›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Potential of AI-based diagnostic grading system for knee osteoarthritis.

Saman Shahid, Aamir Wali, Aatir Javaid, Shahid Zikria, Onur Osman, Jawad Rasheed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Saman ShahidDepartment of Sciences and Humanities, National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences (NUCES), FAST Lahore Campus, Lahore, Pakistan.
Aamir WaliDepartment of Data Sciences, National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences (NUCES), FAST Lahore Campus, Lahore, Pakistan.
Aatir JavaidDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University College of Medicine, The University of Lahore (UOL), Lahore, Pakistan.
Shahid ZikriaDepartment of Sciences and Humanities, National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences (NUCES), FAST Lahore Campus, Lahore, Pakistan.
Onur OsmanDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Istanbul Topkapi University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Jawad RasheedDepartment of Computer Engineering, Istanbul Sabahattin Zaim University, Istanbul, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a progressive musculoskeletal disorder and a leading cause of disability worldwide. Early and accurate diagnosis is crucial for timely intervention; however, conventional manual grading using radiographs is prone to variability. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based computer-aided diagnostic (CAD) systems offer potential to improve detection and grading accuracy. Objective: This study aimed to develop and evaluate an AI-based diagnostic grading system for KOA using X-ray imaging and transfer learning techniques, with the goal of assisting clinicians and medical trainees in early and precise diagnosis. Methods: An experimental cross-sectional study was conducted using 301 radiographs (602 knee images) collected from the Social Security Teaching Hospital, Lahore. The dataset included Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grades 0-4, with labeling based on pain observation and expert orthopedic assessment. Image preprocessing involved binary thresholding, morphological operations, knee isolation, normalization, and zero-padding. Transfer learning with DenseNet-121 served as the base network, augmented by convolutional and fully connected layers. Performance was evaluated against other deep learning architectures (DenseNet201, ResNet50, MobileNet) and classical machine learning algorithms (SVM, decision tree, random forest). Metrics included accuracy, area under the curve (AUC), precision, and recall. Results: DenseNet-121 demonstrated the most robust performance among the tested models, achieving an accuracy of 68.85%, an AUC of 85.67%, a precision of 68.33%, and a recall of 67.21% on the independent test set. Comparative models, including DenseNet201 and MobileNet, exhibited lower accuracies (≈60 to 61%) and AUCs (≈80 to 83%). Machine learning approaches underperformed, with a maximum accuracy of 55.73%. The primary challenges included dataset imbalance and the difficulty in distinguishing between grade 0 and grade 1 due to overlapping radiographic features. Conclusion: The proposed AI-based CAD system shows promise for supporting KOA diagnosis and grading in clinical practice, particularly for training junior clinicians and radiologists. Despite limitations of dataset imbalance and restricted single-center data, transfer learning with DenseNet-121 achieved reliable performance. Future work should focus on expanding datasets to encompass diverse populations, incorporating multimodal inputs, and validating generalizability across various clinical settings. This approach highlights the growing role of AI in musculoskeletal imaging and its potential to enhance early disease detection and patient care.

Indexed as

AI-based diagnosiscomputational imagingcomputer-aided diagnostic systemdisease predictionhealthcare AIradiologytransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID41244763
PMCPMC12611929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.