SynthesisDrug design, development and therapy2025
Population Pharmacokinetics of Tigecycline and Implications for Individualized Therapy Optimization: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Drug design, development and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics index of high-dose tigecycline in patients with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales bloodstream infection: a prospective study.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Case Report: A case of carbapenem hypersensitivity and tigecycline-associated coagulopathy after immunotherapy for advanced oral cancer.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical outcomes and their relationship with tigecycline exposure in critically ill patients with drug resistant infections.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tigecycline, owing to its broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity, has emerged as an important option in the treatment of infections. However, its optimal dosing strategy remains controversial in clinical practice. Recent studies have provided valuable insights into the population pharmacokinetics (PopPK) of tigecycline. This review aims to synthesize the current literature to offer theoretical guidance for individualized clinical management. Methods: A systematic search of PopPK studies on tigecycline published from inception to April 2025 was conducted in the PubMed and Web of Science databases. The pharmacokinetics of tigecycline in different populations were systematically reviewed following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Results: 16 studies were included, of which 11 focused on critically ill populations (such as those with severe infections, sepsis, renal replacement therapy, multi-drug resistant Gram-negative infections, and impaired liver function, etc). The majority of studies (12/16) adopted a two-compartment model, with the typical parameter ranges as follows: clearance (CL) 3.09-25.2 L/h, intercompartmental clearance (Q) 31.9-85.1 L/h, central volume of distribution (V1) 30.9-162 L, and peripheral volume of distribution (V2) 87.9-1030 L. This systematic analysis suggested that covariates influencing tigecycline pharmacokinetics were primarily classified into three categories: hepatic function indicators, renal function markers, and body weight-related parameters. All included models underwent internal validation. Conclusion: Based on the existing evidence, it is recommended to use high-dose tigecycline (100mg, q12h) for drug-resistant bacterial infections, cSSI and VAP, and consider combination therapy. Individualized dose adjustment should be based on liver function and the degree of drug resistance of the pathogen, without considering renal function. The application of other covariates and the model needs to be further verified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.