Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41244672›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2025

Improving the profiling of wheat bacterial and fungal endophytic communities-a PCR clamping approach.

Benjamin Dubois, Mathieu Delitte, Claude Bragard, Anne Legrève, Anne Chandelier, Frédéric Debode

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Benjamin DuboisBioengineering Unit, Life Sciences Department, Walloon Agricultural Research Centre, Gembloux, Belgium.
Mathieu DelitteEarth and Life Institute - Applied Microbiology, Plant Health, UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Claude BragardEarth and Life Institute - Applied Microbiology, Plant Health, UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Anne LegrèveEarth and Life Institute - Applied Microbiology, Plant Health, UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Anne ChandelierPlant and Forest Health Unit, Life Sciences Department, Walloon Agricultural Research Centre, Gembloux, Belgium.
Frédéric DebodeBioengineering Unit, Life Sciences Department, Walloon Agricultural Research Centre, Gembloux, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Plant-associated endophytic microbial communities are an important source of biological diversity. To study them, efficient, robust, and standardized characterization methods are necessary. These communities are usually profiled using amplicon high-throughput sequencing (metabarcoding), but the large amount of host DNA often leads to substantial co-amplification of organellar sequences, thereby hampering accurate characterization. A promising solution is the use of PCR clamps, modified oligomers that block non-target DNA amplification. However, no practical guidelines are currently available to support their development, and no sets of clamps enabling comprehensive characterization of endophytic bacterial and fungal communities associated with wheat ( Results: We developed PCR clamps to block wheat DNA co-amplification while targeting bacterial or fungal populations. For bacteria, two clamping strategies [blocking primers and peptide nucleic acid (PNA)] were evaluated on the 16S V5V7 region. The PNA exhibited superior efficiency (99.8% bacterial reads), whereas blocking primers still performed well (67-98%) and offered a cheaper alternative. The PNA approach was retained for subsequent designs due to its higher efficiency, and two additional PNAs targeting the 16S V4 region were designed to block chloroplast and mitochondrial DNA, respectively. The best results were achieved using both PNAs simultaneously, with 80% of reads being of bacterial origin. For fungi, two PNA clamps were designed targeting ITS1 and ITS2, leading to a substantial reduction in wheat DNA co-amplification, with up to 94 and 75% fungal reads obtained using the ITS1- and ITS2-targeting PNA, respectively. The results also highlighted that profiling endophytic communities without clamps risks significantly underestimating microbial diversity. Furthermore, four bacterial and fungal mock communities were created as tools for standardization and internal control, confirming that our clamps do not inhibit microbial DNA amplification. Conclusion: Whereas amplifications without clamps yielded almost exclusively plant reads, the clamps developed here significantly increased the proportion of microbial reads. This in turn enhanced microbial diversity recovery and the reliability of conclusions drawn from endophytic community analyses. The methodology described provides a framework for clamp development that can be reproduced and adapted to any other host species.

Indexed as

blocking primerclampendophytemetabarcodingmicrobiomePNATriticum aestivumwheat

Identifiers

PMID41244672
PMCPMC12615186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.