ArticleJournal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry
Applying Machine-Learning Models on Lateral Cephalogram Parameters to Classify Skeletal Classes I and III Arab Orthodontic Patients, Instead of Individualized Parameters.
Article in Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: The sagittal skeletal correlation involving the maxilla and mandible is commonly assessed utilizing the A point, Nasion, B point (ANB) angle and Wits appraisal. Recently, ethnicity-specific diagnostic values have been proposed to improve accuracy. This study investigates whether machine learning (ML) models can classify Arab orthodontic cases identified with skeletal class I or class III determined only by standard skeletal measurement indicators, without relying on individualized equations. Materials and Methods: Lateral cephalograms from 422 Arab orthodontic patients were analyzed in this study. Five supervised ML algorithms-linear discriminant analysis, support vector machine, K-nearest neighbor, random forest, and Classification and Regression tree-were developed and evaluated utilizing a 10-fold resampling technique. This study compared full-feature models with those using limited parameter sets, such as the Wits index and Sella-Nasion-B point angle measurement. Additionally, regression models were constructed to predict ANB angle using Wits, age, and gender. Results: Full-feature models achieved up to 97% accuracy, whereas reduced models maintained high performance (up to 91%) using Wits, S-N-B, and S-N-Pg angles. A marked positive association ( Conclusions: ML models can effectively classify skeletal classes I and III malocclusions in Arab subjects using basic cephalometric data, offering a reliable alternative to individualized assessment tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.