ReviewFrontiers in toxicology2025
Developing an approach for evaluating the cardiotoxic potential of botanicals.
Review in Frontiers in toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Vision to Reality: Five Years of the Botanical Safety Consortium.Pharmaceutical biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Botanicals (e.g., extracts derived from plants, algae, or fungi) are increasingly utilized by consumers with the hope of enhancing their health, managing symptoms, or preventing ailments; however, these products have often had limited pre-market toxicity testing. Traditional toxicity testing (e.g., rodent testing) is complicated by the nature of botanicals as complex mixtures and the potential for lot-to-lot variability in chemical constituents. Cardiotoxicity is a key area of concern, as adverse effects on the cardiovascular system can have severe consequences, and although not commonly reported, there have been reports of adverse cardiac events. New approach methodologies (NAMs) offer human-relevant, efficient, innovative, and cost-effective solutions for evaluating the cardiotoxicity of botanicals. The Botanical Safety Consortium (BSC) was established to focus on identifying suitable NAMs to screen for potential toxicities associated with these widely used products. This manuscript outlines the BSC Cardiotoxicity Working Group's approach for evaluating NAMs for assessing the potential cardiotoxicity of botanicals. These NAMs leverage
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.